‘USA Today’ Puts Christianity in the Crosshairs With ‘Demonic’ Story

This is what happened last week when USA Today ran a front page story headlined,
Share:

Facts don’t always line up to tell the truth—especially in today’s world of news, where facts are often used to lead the reader or viewer to believe a complete lie.

This is what happened last week when USA Today ran a front-page story headlined, “Genital mutilation victims break their silence: ‘This is demonic.'”

Under the headline was a picture of an elderly woman with a bolded statement, saying, “A. Renee Bergstrom, 72, said a fundamentalist Christian doctor mutilated her genitals in 1947 to prevent her from masturbating.”

And there was her picture, on the front page under the headline, with the name “Christian” in bold.

We’re grateful USA Today took on this gruesome issue—an issue that exists primarily in extreme sects of the Islamic religion. But at first glance, you wouldn’t know that crucial fact, because the front cover only highlighted the word “Christian.”

The truth is, neither the Bible nor any Christian doctrine or denomination condones female genital mutilation. As a matter of fact, the Christian faith not only elevates and celebrates women, it cherishes the pleasure of sexual intimacy.

But USA Today didn’t report those facts. It simply took one fact—one that is so extreme and opposed to the Christian faith—and positioned it on the front page, reporting in such a way as to lead the reader to believe fundamental Christian belief condones this practice.

By the time you’re done reading the story, religion simply looks foolish, especially Christianity.

We don’t doubt it’s a fact some wacked, professing Christian doctor mutilated a woman 70 years ago. But to take that fact and create a narrative that this is somehow a Christian belief is to lead the reader to believe a complete lie. Despite overwhelming evidence female genital mutilation is primarily found in extreme sects of the Islamic faith and is pervasive predominantly in the Middle East, I ignored these facts and ran with one simple fact that pushed its narrative—one that seeks to discredit religion, especially Christianity.

The word “Islam” was not even mentioned once on the cover, but the word “Christian” was. Interesting.

To connect Christianity to female genital mutilation is absurd. And to not have one pastor or reputable Christian teacher comment as to what our faith actually says about this topic was to simply take a fact and tell a lie.

So for those who read the article and wonder if the Christian faith truly teaches sex for women is not to be enjoyed, listen to how God’s Word speaks about the subject:

God gave us sexual intimacy, and He created it to be enjoyed. To cut a woman’s genitalia would be to alter God’s amazing design in a woman’s life. So regardless of how USA Today reports the facts, the truth is the truth. {eoa}

 

Share:

Related topics:

See an error in this article?

Send us a correction

To contact us or to submit an article

Click and play our featured shows

Are You Under Spiritual Authority or in a Cult?

In the latest Demon Slayer podcast with Alexander Pagani, Isaiah Saldivar, Mike Signorelli and Vlad Savchuk, the four men of God got down to talking about the importance of Christians having a spiritual covering, and how to know if your...

United Methodist Church Drops LGBTQ Clergy Ban

There was no debate when the United Methodist Church repealed the decades-old ruling which prohibited “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” from serving as ministers within the denomination. For the many who have witnessed a mass exodus from the church founded by John...

God Needs Your Voice with Emma Stark

80. God Needs Your Voice Let’s not be disingenuous, God has proven through the millennia, and according to His holy Bible, that He uses the voice of humans to decree His will among the nations. Remember Moses and His encounter...

Is Profanity Acceptable for Christians?

Profanity is one of the things that we cannot escape in our world today. For Christians, we are called to live in but not be of the world. However, what is the proper response we can have to a topic...

1 2 3 4 5 97 98 99 100
Scroll to Top