Court Upholds Decision to Ban Nativity

California courts upheld a decision to not let a nativity scene be displayed.
Share:

A federal appeals court on Thursday found a Southern California city acted without violating the U.S. constitutional protection of free speech when it prevented a group from installing Christmas nativity displays at a public park. 

The controversy over nativity displays at a park overlooking the ocean in Santa Monica raised questions about how government can remain neutral when faced with competition for public space between religious and atheist groups.

Santa Monica in the 1950s began allowing residents every December to erect in the park large dioramas depicting scenes from the biblical story of Christmas. 

In 2011, a number of atheists applied for space in what the builders of the Christian-themed scenes believed was an attempt to keep them and other religious groups from installing their displays. The atheists opposed the installation of nativity scenes in a public park, saying it was a violation of the constitutional separation of church and state.

Santa Monica city leaders responded by creating a lottery system to hand out space in the park for the displays, and the atheists won most spots.

With creators of the nativity scenes and atheists vowing to submit large numbers of applications, city officials decided to prohibit displays in the park.

The Santa Monica Nativity Scenes Committee, a group of residents responsible for creating the nativity scenes, sued the city in 2012, accusing it of violating their rights to free speech under the U.S. Constitution.

A U.S. District judge later ruled the city had acted with neutrality when it prohibited all displays, prompting the committee to appeal.On Thursday, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s judgment and ruled in favor of the city.

“We do not doubt that the committee resents the way in which the City curtailed its traditional way of celebrating the Christmas season in Palisades Park, but its grievances do not state a viable claim that the city violated the First Amendment” of the Constitution, Circuit Judge Jay Bybee wrote in a 29-page opinion.

A representative for the Santa Monica Nativity Scenes Committee in an email declined to immediately comment on the decision. 

© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 

Share:

Related topics:

See an error in this article?

Send us a correction

To contact us or to submit an article

Click and play our featured shows

Is This New Technology Fulfilling End Times Prophecy?

Are the most recent technological inventions a fulfillment of end times prophecy? One of the most recent warnings about facial recognition technology is its potential to predict the political orientation of people simply based on their photos, even without expressions....

Should You Be Afraid of These Prophetic Events?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyuam0hh5Wg The recent total solar eclipse on Apr. 8, has sparked intense discussions about its potential significance when it comes to biblical prophecy. Jim Staley of Passion for Truth Ministries shared his insights on the celestial event during an interview...

Prophetic Word: Angels Are Coming to Our Aid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfuv3hhEyNs The spiritual warfare taking place in our nation’s capital is at a fevered pitch. Recently, author Dutch Sheets shared a prophetic dream that his brother, Tim Sheets, had concerning the uprooting of Baal’s roots that have taken hold of...

1 2 3 4 5 97 98 99 100
Scroll to Top