Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act Set to Limit Abortions in South Carolina

Share:

South Carolina’s Republican-controlled House of Representatives approved a bill Wednesday that would ban most abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, moving the state closer to becoming the latest to limit access to the procedure.

State representatives voted 84 to 29 to approve the legislation known as the “Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act” that would ban doctors from performing abortions at the midpoint of a full-term pregnancy unless the woman’s life was at risk.

The bill now moves to the Senate, where if approved and then signed by Republican Governor Nikki Haley, South Carolina would become the 13th state to enact the ban, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit sexual health research organization.

Similar measures and legislation are also pending in West Virginia and Mississippi.

Under the bill, doctors in South Carolina would be required to determine the age of the fetus and include on abortion reports to the state health department whether an ultrasound test was used to determine the age.

Doctors performing an abortion of a fetus at 20 weeks or less would also be required to try to deliver it alive.

Physicians who do not abide by the law would face civil charges of “unprofessional conduct” and penalties up to $10,000 and three years in prison, according to the bill.

Lawmakers backing the bill assert a fetus can feel pain by 20 weeks of gestation and that the state has a duty to protect the unborn child.

“We had over 60 studies introduced to us in committee that (showed) they do feel pain. And the state has a right to step in and protect that child,” said Representative Wendy Nanney.

Democratic Representative Gilda Cobb-Hunter criticized the measure during Wednesday’s debate.

“I find it ironic that in the middle of Women’s History Month we are debating a bill that will severely limit a woman’s right to make decisions that are rightly between her and her family and her physician,” she said.

Cobb-Hunter argued the state’s decision not to expand Medicaid health programs would make healthcare less available for potential families.

“We want to bring them to term but what about the price tag of healthcare and cost for these babies who are born against the will of their parents?” she said.

“(Republicans) plead passionately for life for those fetuses who are yet to be born. When that fetus becomes a child and is delivered, that compassion does not seem to have the same level of interest.”


Editing by Kevin Gray and Matthew Lewis

© 2014 Thompson Reuters. All rights reserved.

+ posts
Share:

Related topics:

See an error in this article?

Send us a correction

To contact us or to submit an article

Click and play our featured shows

Man sitting on couch with head in hands.

One Leader’s Failure Isn’t an Excuse to Leave the Faith

I started seriously following Jesus in the 1970s. From those early days until now, I’ve watched many leaders fail. During the days of the Jesus Movement, we learned that Lonnie Frisbee—the hippie evangelist portrayed in the movie “Jesus Revolution”—got divorced...

Evangelist Mario Murillo

2024: The Courage to Confront False Prophets

As we enter the new year, renowned evangelist Mario Murillo has shared a powerful prophetic word for 2024, emphasizing the need for Christians to be discerning in the face of false prophets and to strengthen themselves in the Lord. Drawing...

Karl Marx

The Biggest Revelation of 2023

On Dec. 29, on Facebook and X, I asked this question: “What do you personally believe was the biggest revelation in American society in the last year—in other words, the cultural or political or spiritual phenomenon that suddenly became crystal...

1 2 3 4 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
Scroll to Top