Outrageous: Obama Would Veto Bill Punishing Gosnell-Style Infanticide

Share:

Late on Wednesday, the White House issued a statement that President Obama “will veto” a bill that provides protection for babies who are born alive during late abortions – because he thinks the bill “would likely have a chilling effect” on access to late-term abortions.

The U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on Friday on the bill, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (H.R. 3504). The bill will make it a federal crime to kill a baby who is born alive during an abortion, either through overt acts of violence or gross neglect.

“President Obama’s subservience to the abortion lobby is so complete that he now threatens to use his pen to protect the abortionist who would kill a baby born alive, rather than to protect that helpless baby,” said the president of the National Right to Life Committee, Carol Tobias.

Douglas D. Johnson, NRLC legislative director, added, “Congressional Democrats who follow the president into this extreme territory will have many future opportunities to try to explain why they voted against making it a crime to snip the spine of a born-alive baby, or to harvest that baby’s liver while her heart still beats.”

Since 2002, federal law (1 U.S.C. §8) says that “every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development” is a “person” for all federal law purposes. The 2002 law defines “born alive” in terms of traditional criteria – the presence of a beating heart, respiration, or definite movement of voluntary muscles. This law passed Congress without a dissenting vote.

As an Illinois state senator, Barack Obama voted against a law that would have protected babies born alive from grisly, Gosnell-style abortions.

When running for president in 2008, Obama insisted that if he’d been in the U.S. Senate in 2002, he too would have voted for this law – that is, he would have voted to recognize every born-alive baby as a “person,” whether before or after the point of “viability” (“at any stage of development”).

“So now we know – President Obama agreed that these born-alive babies are legal persons — but he is also fine with allowing them to be killed because, gee whiz, to forbid killing them might ‘chill’ the availability of late abortions,” Johnson said. 

In a September 16 letter to the House of Representatives in support of the new bill, NRLC said, “In 2013, Dr. Kermit Gosnell of Philadelphia was convicted under state law of multiple homicides of such born-alive infants, but such a prosecution and conviction is uncommon. In some jurisdictions, local authorities seem reluctant to investigate reports of infants born alive during abortions, or to bring appropriate indictments even in cases in which the publicly reported evidence of gross neglect or overt lethal acts seems strong.” 

The complete NRLC letter is posted here

Detailed documentation on the history of the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 (1 U.S.C. §8) and related issues is available on the NRLC website.

A 2008 NRLC “white paper” on Barack Obama’s opposition, as an Illinois state senator, to recognizing babies born-alive during abortions as legal persons is here

+ posts
Share:

Related topics:

See an error in this article?

Send us a correction

To contact us or to submit an article

Click and play our featured shows

DC Metro bus

DC Metro Rejects Christian Advertisements, Prompting ACLU Lawsuit

A recent lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and First Liberty Institute against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) has stirred up discussions about religious freedom and the First Amendment. The lawsuit claims that the WMATA’s...

DC Metro bus

DC Metro Rejects Christian Advertisements, Prompting ACLU Lawsuit

A recent lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and First Liberty Institute against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) has stirred up discussions about religious freedom and the First Amendment. The lawsuit claims that the WMATA’s...

Menorah

Menorah Lighting Rejected from Art and Music Festival

Recently a Virginia rabbi’s request to perform a menorah lighting at a local art and music festival was denied. Despite being in the middle of the Hanukkah season, the rabbi’s request was denied, according to Fox News, because the festival...

Menorah

Menorah Lighting Rejected from Art and Music Festival

Recently a Virginia rabbi’s request to perform a menorah lighting at a local art and music festival was denied. Despite being in the middle of the Hanukkah season, the rabbi’s request was denied, according to Fox News, because the festival...

Satanic display in the Iowa Statehouse.

Update: Iowa Governor Weighs in on Satanic Display

In recent days, a controversial display has been erected in the Iowa state capitol by The Satanic Temple Iowa. This display, which features a silver ram’s head on a red-caped mannequin, has sparked significant debate among politicians and citizens alike....

Satanic display in the Iowa Statehouse.

Update: Iowa Governor Weighs in on Satanic Display

In recent days, a controversial display has been erected in the Iowa state capitol by The Satanic Temple Iowa. This display, which features a silver ram’s head on a red-caped mannequin, has sparked significant debate among politicians and citizens alike....

1 2 3 4 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
Scroll to Top