Loretta Lynch Refuses to Answer Questions About Clinton Investigation

Loretta Lynch
Share:

U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch was prepared to discuss a wide range of topics with the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, except one.

“As you are aware, last week I met with Director Comey and career prosecutors and agents who conducted [the investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email system during her time at the State Department],” she said. “I received and accepted their unanimous recommendation that the thorough, year-long investigation be closed and no charges be brought against any individuals within the scope of the investigation.

“While I understand that this investigation has generated significant public interest, as Attorney General, it would be inappropriate for me to comment further on the underlying facts of the investigation or the legal basis for the team’s recommendation. I can tell you that I am extremely proud of the tremendous work of the dedicated prosecutors and agents on this matter.”

And, as Republicans asked her questions relative to her role in that investigation, she continued to steadfastly refuse to comment. And, after about an hour of the attorney general’s stonewalling, committee chairman U.S. Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) issued a statement through the committee’s website.

“It’s clear that, a little over an hour into today’s hearing, Attorney General Lynch has no intention of answering any of our questions regarding the Department’s decision not to charge former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, even the most basic questions about the legal elements the government is obligated to prove in a criminal prosecution,” he said. “Instead of providing the Judiciary Committee with the candor provided to Congress last Thursday by FBI Director Comey, Attorney General Lynch instead is dodging any responsibility to be forthright to Congress by referring members to the statements of her subordinate.

“If Attorney General Lynch doesn’t want to answer questions about the investigation, then she should have appointed a special prosecutor at the start of the investigation. Instead, she never even sought to recuse herself, despite the fact that Secretary Clinton is the wife of her former boss, President Bill Clinton.

“It’s equally troubling that she met privately with former President Clinton just days before FBI Director Comey announced that he does not recommend criminal charges be filed against Secretary Clinton. The American people deserve transparency about this investigation.”

Goodlatte’s questioning of Lynch may be viewed below.

+ posts
Share:

Related topics:

See an error in this article?

Send us a correction

To contact us or to submit an article

Click and play our featured shows

Are You Under Spiritual Authority or in a Cult?

In the latest Demon Slayer podcast with Alexander Pagani, Isaiah Saldivar, Mike Signorelli and Vlad Savchuk, the four men of God got down to talking about the importance of Christians having a spiritual covering, and how to know if your...

United Methodist Church Drops LGBTQ Clergy Ban

There was no debate when the United Methodist Church repealed the decades-old ruling which prohibited “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” from serving as ministers within the denomination. For the many who have witnessed a mass exodus from the church founded by John...

God Needs Your Voice with Emma Stark

80. God Needs Your Voice Let’s not be disingenuous, God has proven through the millennia, and according to His holy Bible, that He uses the voice of humans to decree His will among the nations. Remember Moses and His encounter...

Is Profanity Acceptable for Christians?

Profanity is one of the things that we cannot escape in our world today. For Christians, we are called to live in but not be of the world. However, what is the proper response we can have to a topic...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 97 98 99 100
Scroll to Top