President Obama and the Islamic Republic of Iran have (at least) one thing in common: No one trusts or believes them.
No serious observer expects the mullahs of Tehran, who have restated their hope to wipe Israel off the face of the earth as recently as this week, to honor the terms of the agreement they made with the Great Satan. Islamic theology allows Muslims to mislead “infidels” if falsehood leads to the triumph of Allah.
“The Iran Nuclear Deal was not negotiated by an honest nation but rather one that sponsors terrorism,” said Penny Nance of Concerned Women for America.
But Congress is openly questioning the honesty of President Obama, as well. It came to light that he did not disclose numerous side deals he worked out with the Iranian regime.
Congress wants to know: What else is he hiding?
“The American people deserve the full truth surrounding President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran,” said Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-TN. “Yet, in defiance of the law, the president has refused to allow Congress to review two secret side agreements to the deal. The security of our nation, our children and grandchildren depend upon knowing exactly what the president has conceded to Iran. Iran has not earned the right to be trusted.”
And neither has the president, she made clear.
“It is disturbing to me that President Obama is so willing to extend the Iranian regime trust it does not deserve by hiding the contents of his nuclear deal with Iran from Congress and the American people.”
Rep. Jim Bridentine, R-OK, has the same question: “The Obama administration’s characteristic refusal to follow the law effectively undermined the congressional review process he signed into law.”
One of those allows Iran to effectively conduct its own inspections.
What else is Obama hiding, and what other threats to American security lurk in this agreement?
See an error in this article?
To contact us or to submit an article
