Bill Banning Sex-Selection Abortions Fails in House

selective-sex abortions
Share:

The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday conducted a roll-call vote on the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act (H.R. 3541), a bill that would make it illegal to perform or coerce a sex-selection abortion.

The vote was 246-168 in favor of the bill—a strong majority, although short of the two-thirds vote required under the current fast-track procedure.

In a statement obtained exclusively by ABC News late Wednesday, the White House acknowledged that President Obama opposes the bill.

“We are heartened that a strong majority of House members voted to ban performing or coercing abortions for the purpose of eliminating unborn babies of an undesired sex—usually, girls,” said National Right to Life Committee legislative director Douglas Johnson. “Shamefully, President Obama, and a minority of 168 House members, complied with the political demands of pro-abortion pressure groups, rather than defend the coerced women, and their unborn daughters, who are victimized by sex-selection abortions.”

Among the organizations that warned House members not to vote for the bill was the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), the nation’s major abortion provider. According to the NRLC, PPFA sent an email memo to House members on May 29 warning of its “intent to score” a vote for the bill as a vote against “women’s health.”

Also on May 29, The Huffington Post reported that “no Planned Parenthood clinic will deny a woman an abortion based on her reasons for wanting one, except in those states that explicitly prohibit sex-selective abortions (Arizona, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Illinois).”

The U.S. Congress has already condemned gender-selective abortion in China, but PRENDA is the first nationwide attempt to address the practice.

Widespread sex-selective abortion has resulted in lopsided gender ratios in parts of China and especially India. Studies in India reveal that those families in higher income brackets and with greater access to education are the most likely to practice gender-selective abortion.

“Churches should be among the first to stand up for vulnerable baby girls. All human life is intrinsically valuable,” said Mark Tooley, president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy. “Years of research have revealed serious instability in societies with lopsided gender ratios. The devaluation of women results in increased sex trafficking and more frequent instances of sexual violence. Consensus against gender-selective abortion should be easy for churches. But where we should hear strong voices, there is mostly silence.”

Share:

Related topics:

See an error in this article?

Send us a correction

To contact us or to submit an article

Click and play our featured shows

Are You Under Spiritual Authority or in a Cult?

In the latest Demon Slayer podcast with Alexander Pagani, Isaiah Saldivar, Mike Signorelli and Vlad Savchuk, the four men of God got down to talking about the importance of Christians having a spiritual covering, and how to know if your...

United Methodist Church Drops LGBTQ Clergy Ban

There was no debate when the United Methodist Church repealed the decades-old ruling which prohibited “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” from serving as ministers within the denomination. For the many who have witnessed a mass exodus from the church founded by John...

God Needs Your Voice with Emma Stark

80. God Needs Your Voice Let’s not be disingenuous, God has proven through the millennia, and according to His holy Bible, that He uses the voice of humans to decree His will among the nations. Remember Moses and His encounter...

Is Profanity Acceptable for Christians?

Profanity is one of the things that we cannot escape in our world today. For Christians, we are called to live in but not be of the world. However, what is the proper response we can have to a topic...

1 2 3 4 5 97 98 99 100
Scroll to Top