Religious, Academic Leaders Call HHS Mandate ‘Unacceptable’

President Barack Obama
Share:

More than 500 people have signed a statement rejecting the Obama administration’s Health and Human Service mandate. In the latest of religious and academic scholars to support the statement, His Eminence, Timothy Cardinal Dolan, the president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and Archbishop of New York, signed his name on Monday.

In response to President Obama’s announcement of a government compromise over the new controversial mandate requiring employers to pay for abortion-causing drugs and other services, the letter, titled “Unacceptable,” says this is “a grave violation of religious freedom and cannot stand.”

It continues: “It is an insult to the intelligence of … people of faith and conscience to imagine that they will accept an assault on their religious liberty if only it is covered up by a cheap accounting trick.”

After a dispute broke out over the HHS mandate, the administration replied by saying religious organizations would not have to pay for abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization and contraception, but instead all insurance companies will be required to do so. Once a religious employer purchases insurance—which it is required to do by law—the insurance company will then contact insured employees to advise them of the terms of the policy.

“It does not matter who explains the terms of policy purchased by the religiously affiliated or observant employer,” the statement argues. “What matters is what services the policy covers.”

Under this new rule, the letter says, “the government still coerces religious institutions and individuals to purchase insurance policies that include the very same services.”

Signed by leading scholars, university presidents, and other academic administrators, activists and religious leaders from a multitude of faiths, the statement also says Obama’s “so-called ‘accommodation’” of religious liberty changes nothing of moral substance.

Not every signatory agrees on the morality of the use of contraception, sterilization and abortifacient drugs. What unties them is the conviction that the government should not coerce religious institutions or individuals into violating their most deeply held beliefs as a condition of serving or employing those who do not share their faith.

The original drafters of the letter are Harvard’s Mary Ann Glendon, Princeton’s Robert P. George, Notre Dame’s Carter Snead, Catholic University of America’s president John Garvey and Yuval Levin, of the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Share:

Related topics:

See an error in this article?

Send us a correction

To contact us or to submit an article

Click and play our featured shows

Are You Under Spiritual Authority or in a Cult?

In the latest Demon Slayer podcast with Alexander Pagani, Isaiah Saldivar, Mike Signorelli and Vlad Savchuk, the four men of God got down to talking about the importance of Christians having a spiritual covering, and how to know if your...

United Methodist Church Drops LGBTQ Clergy Ban

There was no debate when the United Methodist Church repealed the decades-old ruling which prohibited “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” from serving as ministers within the denomination. For the many who have witnessed a mass exodus from the church founded by John...

God Needs Your Voice with Emma Stark

80. God Needs Your Voice Let’s not be disingenuous, God has proven through the millennia, and according to His holy Bible, that He uses the voice of humans to decree His will among the nations. Remember Moses and His encounter...

Is Profanity Acceptable for Christians?

Profanity is one of the things that we cannot escape in our world today. For Christians, we are called to live in but not be of the world. However, what is the proper response we can have to a topic...

1 2 3 4 5 97 98 99 100
Scroll to Top