Montana Supreme Court Denies Same-Sex Couples Benefits

gay couple
Share:

The Montana Supreme Court on Monday denied a request by same-sex couples to order the state to provide them the same protections and benefits as married couples, but the gay couples will continue their legal challenge.

Six same-sex couples in 2010 sued Montana in state District Court over laws they said deprived them of equal protection and other rights guaranteed by the state constitution. The couples asked the court to force the state legislature to pass a set of laws that would ensure gay couples were treated the same as married couples in such areas as death benefits and bereavement leave from work.

In the 4-3 decision, Montana justices agreed with the lower court that the challenge brought by the couples was too broad and a request to force the legislature to retool 340 state statutes would violate the constitutional separation of powers between the legislature and the judiciary.

But the justices reversed the lower court’s denial of the couples’ request to amend the lawsuit to address the issue of broadness.

Writing for the majority and referring to claims by the couples that they have suffered discrimination because of the state’s failure to recognize their relationships, Chief Justice Mike McGrath wrote, “These are important issues and should be decided only after the statutes involved are specifically identified and specifically analyzed in district court proceedings.”

Amy Cannata, a spokeswoman for the American Civil Liberties Union of Montana, which represents the couples, said on Monday that the couples will file a revised lawsuit at a future date.

“We’ll keep moving ahead with this until same-sex couples get the legal protection they need here in Montana,” she said.

Writing for the dissent, Montana Justice James C. Nelson chided the majority for failing to find for same-sex couples alleging unequal treatment.

“I have never disagreed more strongly with this Court as I do in this case,” he wrote. Nelson added that the decision “wrongly deprives an abused minority of their civil rights.”

The lawsuit did not seek to legalize gay marriage.

Montana voters in 2004 approved a constitutional amendment that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman.


Editing by Corrie MacLaggan and Lisa Shumaker.

© 2012 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

+ posts
Share:

Related topics:

See an error in this article?

Send us a correction

To contact us or to submit an article

Click and play our featured shows

How You Can Live With Purpose and Passion

Have you noticed that some Christians are never satisfied or happy? They always have a long face, and they always talk about their problems and circumstances. Their attitude is lukewarm, lifeless, apathetic and pathetic. The world may have this type...

Are You Under Spiritual Authority or in a Cult?

In the latest Demon Slayer podcast with Alexander Pagani, Isaiah Saldivar, Mike Signorelli and Vlad Savchuk, the four men of God got down to talking about the importance of Christians having a spiritual covering, and how to know if your...

United Methodist Church Drops LGBTQ Clergy Ban

There was no debate when the United Methodist Church repealed the decades-old ruling which prohibited “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” from serving as ministers within the denomination. For the many who have witnessed a mass exodus from the church founded by John...

God Needs Your Voice with Emma Stark

80. God Needs Your Voice Let’s not be disingenuous, God has proven through the millennia, and according to His holy Bible, that He uses the voice of humans to decree His will among the nations. Remember Moses and His encounter...

Is Profanity Acceptable for Christians?

Profanity is one of the things that we cannot escape in our world today. For Christians, we are called to live in but not be of the world. However, what is the proper response we can have to a topic...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 97 98 99 100
Scroll to Top