Note: A couple of days ago, an eyewitness swore under penalty of perjury he has personal knowledge that the Smartmatic election software was designed to cheat. His affidavit is startling.
He was personally present with Hugo Chavez when Smartmatic officials presented the software to Chavez. He personally observed Smartmatic change the outcome of elections. He says that Dominion and other election tabulating companies rely upon software that are descendants of Smartmatic programming. This software was widely used in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, particularly in the contested states.
A sworn affidavit states that widely used election machine software in the U.S. 2020 election was specifically designed to alter results in real time. Mark Malloch-Brown, the chairman of Smartmatic, previously admitted that there was a licensing agreement with Dominion Voting Systems. Malloch-Brown is also a member of the board of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations.
In the affidavit, this eyewitness states:
“I was a direct witness to the creation and operation of an electronic voting system … known as Smartmatic (for) the leaders of … the Venezuelan government.”
“This conspiracy specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias, the person in charge of the National Electoral Council named Jorge Rodriguez, and principals, representatives and personnel from Smartmatic. … The purpose of this conspiracy was to create and operate a voting system that could change the votes in elections from votes against persons running the Venezuelan government to votes in their favor in order to maintain control of the government.”
The sworn statement goes on to add the Smartmatic software was designed in a way the “system could change the vote of each voter without being detected” by the voter as they are voting. The affidavit goes on to describe the exact instructions for fraud that Chavez gave Smartmatic, while this affiant was present.
He states that, “Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produce the software and hardware to accomplish the goals of President Chavez.”
He was present when the software was used to manufacture a win for Venezuelan Marxist Hugo Chavez, and later Nicolas Maduro. He witnessed the votes change in real time.
He goes on to say, “After the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was put in place, I closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated using Smartmatic software. One such election was in Dec. 2006 when Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over Manuel Rosales—a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez versus 3.7 million for Rosales.”
On April 14, 2013, he observed the election involving Nicolas Maduro in real time at the Caracas control center. By 2:00 p.m. that afternoon, Capriles Radonski was ahead by 2 million votes. The decision was made to stop the reporting feed, reset the system and then go back online. The software changed the count, and Maduro “won” by 200,000 votes.
In 2009, Dominion contracted with Smartmatic for the highly contested Philippine elections. Philippine elections have a history fraught with charges of software-induced fraud. The Manila Times wrote that “only the truly uninformed would still find Smartmatic’s combination of PCOS/VCM and CCS an acceptable solution to the automation of Philippine elections,” noting that the “glitches” and the “lack of transparency … convinced us of the system’s unreliability and its vulnerability to tampering.”
In 2012, Smartmatic sued Dominion, claiming Dominion stole significant amounts of Smartmatic technology and implemented its software.
According to Dominion, 40% of U.S. voters in 28 states and Puerto Rico used Dominion Voting Systems in the 2020 presidential election.
The sheer number of credible election fraud reports, (now reportedly over 20,000), and the ballot-counting “glitches” must be thoroughly investigated.
In Antrim County, Michigan—which used Dominion equipment—6,000 votes for Trump were wrongly given to Biden. Blame it on “operator error” if you want, but it seems like Smartmatic and Dominion have a history of such voter “glitches.”
If we sweep these concerns under the rug without proper investigation, then all elections—including the one in 2020—will become a farce.
Not on our watch!
The Constitution provides a path for a contested presidential election. The process is working. And we are working to make sure every legal vote is counted, and every illegal vote is not. {eoa}
For the original article, visit lc.org.
See an error in this article?
To contact us or to submit an article
