Three movie financiers were arrested on Tuesday on charges they defrauded investors of $12 million that was provided to produce films starring, among others Harry Connick Jr. and Willie Nelson.
An indictment filed in Manhattan federal court accused James David Williams, Steven Brown and Gerald Seppala of engaging in a conspiracy to fraudulently solicit investments in films from 2012 to 2016 with promises of guaranteed returns and profit participation.
The indictment said the trio misled investors about their own investment in the films or the funding they had already received from other investors, and used falsified documents to support their claims.
The $12 million they solicited to finance marketing the films was actually used to pay back other investors or for personal expenses, the indictment said.
Williams, for example, used the funds to buy a home in Calabasas, California, a new car and on personal expenses at clothing stores, club memberships and his children’s’ school tuition, the indictment said.
None of the films was identified by name in the indictment. But some of the films matched the description of movies at the heart of a lawsuit by one of their former investors, Bill Busbice of Wyoming.
In that lawsuit, filed in 2014 in federal court in Los Angeles, Busbice said the three men swindled him out of $10.9 million to secure investments in four films.
Those movies included “Angels Sing,” a 2013 Christmas family drama starring Connick and Nelson, and “Left Behind,” a 2014 Christian apocalyptic thriller starring Nicolas Cage.
A lawyer for Busbice declined to comment.
Williams, 54, was arrested in Los Angeles, Brown 46, was arrested in New York and Seppala, 47, was arrested in Minnesota, a spokesman for Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said.
All three face charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and wire fraud. Williams and Brown also face a charge of conspiracy to commit money laundering.
A lawyer for Brown did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Lawyers for Williams and Seppala could not immediately be identified.
The case is U.S. v. Williams et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 16-cr-436. {eoa}
© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
See an error in this article?
To contact us or to submit an article
